Eastpointe Considers Economic Benefits and Community Concerns in Recreational Cannabis Debate

Published 4 days ago Legislation & Policy Updates Ryan Spegal
Cover Image

Eastpointe, Michigan, is at a pivotal juncture regarding its stance on recreational cannabis. Since the legalization of adult-use recreational cannabis in Michigan in 2018, Eastpointe has maintained a cautious approach. Initially, the city opted out of hosting recreational cannabis dispensaries, even as it passed an ordinance in 2021 permitting medical cannabis facilities. This shift marked the entry of the cannabis industry into Eastpointe with the approval of three medical cannabis licenses.

In a progressive move, the Eastpointe City Council is now contemplating an ordinance that would allow recreational cannabis businesses within city limits. This proposal has sparked a lively debate among residents and council members alike. The potential ordinance, drafted by City Attorney Richard Albright at the request of the council, aims to transition existing medical cannabis facilities to recreational ones and possibly allow additional licenses.

Councilwoman Margaret Podsiadlik championed the proposal, citing the economic uplift experienced by other Michigan cities with similar establishments. She highlighted that introducing recreational cannabis businesses could rejuvenate Eastpointe by occupying vacant buildings and boosting local commerce. Similarly, Councilman Harvey Curley supported the initiative, focusing on the substantial tax revenues that recreational cannabis could funnel into city coffers—funds that are not derived from medical cannabis operations. Curley advocated for these funds to be allocated specifically towards enhancing local parks, pointing out the dire state of some recreational spaces in Eastpointe.

However, not all council members are in agreement. Councilman Rob Baker expressed concerns about fairness and legal challenges if the city were to limit recreational licenses to only those businesses currently holding medical ones. He emphasized the risk of lawsuits from potential applicants who might feel excluded from the process.

The public's response has been mixed, with vocal opinions on both sides during council meetings. Supporters of the ordinance argue that legal recreational cannabis facilities will provide regulated, safe environments for purchase and consumption, unlike the uncontrolled black market. They believe that, similar to alcohol, cannabis presence is already a reality, and regulation could help manage its impact more effectively.

Opponents, however, raise significant concerns regarding the social implications of cannabis businesses. They fear increased crime rates, decreased property values, and adverse effects on youth and public health. Notably, long-time resident Lynn Tubben articulated worries about the potential for youth cannabis use leading to broader social issues, such as increased welfare dependence and lower life satisfaction.

Amidst these discussions, rumors of bribery and corruption also surfaced, challenging the council’s integrity. These allegations were firmly denied by council members, including Councilwoman Podsiadlik and Councilman DeMonaco, who called for respectful and accusation-free public discourse.

As the debate continues, Eastpointe’s leadership remains committed to thoroughly researching the implications of introducing recreational cannabis businesses. Mayor Michael Klinefelt underscored the importance of considering all aspects, including the potential for increased blight associated with vacant buildings, before making a final decision.

In conclusion, Eastpointe stands at a crossroads, balancing economic potential against community concerns. The city's approach to managing this issue will require careful consideration of both the financial benefits and the societal impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis businesses.


Bronson City Council Considers Introduction of Recreational Cannabis Businesses

Published 4 days ago Legislation & Policy Updates Ryan Spegal
Cover Image

Bronson, Michigan, continues to deliberate on the possibility of allowing businesses dealing in recreational cannabis within city limits. The matter was a focal point of discussion at the recent Bronson City Council meeting held last Monday.

During the meeting, Mayor Matt Watkins, addressing City Manager Brandon Mersman, highlighted the potential of recreational cannabis businesses as a revenue source. However, he emphasized the necessity for further information to aid community understanding and decision-making.

This isn't the first time the topic has come up for discussion; nearly a year ago, the City Council conducted a public hearing that captured diverse community perspectives on the issue. The ongoing deliberations follow the statewide approval of recreational cannabis in November 2018. Despite this approval, Bronson City Council opted out of the law two months after its passage, deciding to wait until Michigan established clear regulations for the industry. It's important to note that communities have the flexibility to opt in at any time, permitting them to authorize and regulate local businesses that sell recreational cannabis.



Fenton Debates Pros and Cons of Recreational Cannabis Establishments

Published 5 days ago Legislation & Policy Updates Ryan Spegal
Cover Image

Fenton City Hall is actively seeking community input on the potential authorization of recreational cannabis establishments within its boundaries. Two public hearings have been scheduled to facilitate this dialogue: the first on Monday, April 15th, and the second on Wednesday, April 17th, both at 7 p.m. These sessions will be held at the Fenton City Hall, located at 301 S. Leroy St.

The focus of these meetings will be to collect insights, opinions, and information from residents regarding the prospect of cannabis businesses operating in Fenton and the appropriate regulatory measures to be considered. A notice about the public meetings highlighted the importance of community feedback in shaping the city's approach to this issue.

Fenton's City Manager, Lynn Markland, emphasized that the hearings provide a crucial opportunity for residents to express their positions—whether in support or opposition—to the city council. "The city council is eager to hear all perspectives as they deliberate on this matter," Markland commented.

In 2023, local governments in Michigan benefited significantly from cannabis-related activities, receiving a combined total of $87 million in tax revenues from marijuana sales. While acknowledging the financial benefits, Markland clarified that Fenton is not looking to rely on cannabis sales tax revenue as a primary financial resource. "We are not considering recreational marijuana sales as a core component of our fiscal strategy. Instead, we are assessing whether a dispensary would serve the best interests of our community," he explained.


Community Voices Heard in Bad Axe Cannabis Ordinance Debate

Published 5 days ago Legislation & Policy Updates Ryan Spegal
Cover Image

Over the past two years, the City of Bad Axe has been carefully considering the introduction of cannabis businesses into the community. After initially hesitating, the city council, in March 2022, decided to revisit the possibility, directing the then Police Chief David Rothe and his successor, Shawn Webber, to conduct thorough research on the matter. This marked the beginning of a meticulous process to establish a city ordinance concerning cannabis establishments.

Following numerous discussions throughout 2022 and 2023, the council took a decisive step in November by agreeing to develop an ordinance. Although the ordinance is not yet officially approved, a proposed draft has been presented.

The draft outlines that the city may host up to four state-licensed cannabis establishments - comprising two microbusinesses and two retailers. According to the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marijuana Act, a microbusiness is authorized to cultivate up to 150 cannabis plants, process, package, and directly sell or transfer the cannabis to individuals who are at least 21 years old or to a cannabis safety compliance facility, excluding other cannabis establishments. A retailer, on the other hand, is permitted to acquire cannabis from these establishments and sell or transfer it to individuals who are 21 or older.

Each establishment under the city's draft ordinance would be subject to a municipal license fee not exceeding $5,000, requiring annual renewal.

During a recent city council meeting, a public hearing was held, offering a platform for community members to express their views on the ordinance. Only two individuals spoke out.

Lynette Beeler, a Bad Axe area resident, shared her deep concerns about the potential impact of cannabis businesses on the community. With strong ties to Huron County, Beeler emphasized the importance of considering the broader implications of the ordinance beyond financial benefits, citing potential negative effects on the community's wellbeing.

Jesse Klaska, another lifetime resident, echoed the sentiment of limited public engagement in the discussion. He challenged the council to identify benefits of introducing cannabis businesses to Bad Axe, aside from monetary gains, and suggested that any such businesses should be located away from the downtown area and residential neighborhoods, preferably to the north of the city.

Rebecca Bachman, the Bad Axe City Manager, indicated that the next phase involves a public hearing set by the city’s planning commission on April 24th at 6:30 p.m., focusing on zoning for the ordinance. Bachman emphasized the importance of community input and expressed hope for robust public participation. She anticipates that a final decision on the ordinance will be made by the council in May.


Ishpeming Maintains Current Cannabis Retailer Cap After Community Feedback

Published 6 days ago Legislation & Policy Updates Ryan Spegal
Cover Image

The City of Ishpeming has decided against revising its cannabis ordinance, maintaining the current regulation that permits only two cannabis retailers within the city limits. This decision came after a public hearing conducted by the Ishpeming Planning Commission, which was aimed at considering a proposal to amend the city's cannabis ordinance. The proposed amendment sought to authorize the establishment of two processing facilities, two safety compliance facilities, and two secure transfer facilities in addition to the existing retail outlets.

The public hearing, held last Monday, witnessed significant community involvement, with 14 residents from Ishpeming expressing their disapproval of the amendment. They raised concerns about the potential increase in drug presence within the city, arguing against the need for additional cannabis facilities. Notably, there were no voices in support of the proposed changes during the session.

The Ishpeming Planning Commission appreciated the active participation of the city’s residents in the decision-making process. Brooke Routhier, Chair of the Ishpeming Planning Commission, praised the community's engagement, stating, “I absolutely loved what happened tonight. It is very hard to get the public’s input, so to get the public to come out and provide their comment is fantastic. That’s what the whole process is about.”

However, the commission's vote on whether to recommend the ordinance amendment to the City Council ended in a deadlock, with a 4-4 tie, resulting in the failure of the motion to pass. This outcome ensures that the existing regulations governing cannabis retailers in Ishpeming will remain unchanged, reflecting the community's stance against the expansion of cannabis-related facilities in the city.



Breitung Township Stands Firm on Cannabis Dispensary Ban

Published 6 days ago Legislation & Policy Updates Ryan Spegal
Cover Image

Breitung Township has decided to maintain its ban on cannabis dispensaries, a decision underscored by the potential financial benefits these businesses might have offered. During a recent board meeting, the topic resurfaced at the behest of Trustee Ben Peterson, who highlighted the significant state revenue garnered by neighboring municipalities Norway and Iron Mountain from such establishments.

According to a Michigan Department of Treasury announcement in March, Norway and Iron Mountain are set to receive $118,172 and $59,086, respectively, from the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marijuana Act. Additionally, Dickinson County is anticipated to receive $177,259 in adult-use cannabis distributions.

Dispensaries like Lume and Rize in Iron Mountain, along with Higher Love Cannabis in Norway, have contributed to these figures. Peterson argued that rejecting the cannabis industry means forgoing substantial funds that could benefit township infrastructure and services, such as roads and fire trucks. He emphasized the lack of crime increases related to dispensaries, as confirmed by the Dickinson County Sheriff’s Department and local police.

However, opposition from Supervisor Denny Olson centered on the belief that the financial gain from dispensaries would not justify changing the existing ordinance. Olson expressed concerns about the community impact of allowing a dispensary, despite the relatively small projected income.

Superintendent Steve Mulka noted that initial interest from dispensaries was high due to the township's low property taxes, but he now views the market as oversaturated. However, he acknowledged a reduction in complaints about the odor from cannabis cultivation since the legalization of recreational use in Michigan.

Treasurer Christina Maki supported the idea of welcoming dispensaries, pointing out the missed opportunity for additional township revenue. She advocated for learning from other municipalities' experiences to implement strict regulations within their ordinance.

Despite these discussions, the motion to uphold the ban passed, with Peterson, Maki, and Township Clerk Wendy Larson opposing the decision. The township's stance continues to prevent cannabis dispensaries from operating within its jurisdiction, even amidst evidence of their financial benefits to neighboring areas.